Comments on: True or false? http://www.kuliniewicz.org/blog/archives/2008/03/19/true-or-false/ After all, it could only cost you your life, and you got that for free. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:09:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Ryan http://www.kuliniewicz.org/blog/archives/2008/03/19/true-or-false/#comment-1814 Ryan Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:38:22 +0000 http://www.kuliniewicz.org/blog/archives/2008/03/19/true-or-false/#comment-1814 I hope so, 'cuz I thought it was "elseiffor" I hope so, ‘cuz I thought it was “elseiffor”

]]> By: Paul Kuliniewicz http://www.kuliniewicz.org/blog/archives/2008/03/19/true-or-false/#comment-1808 Paul Kuliniewicz Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:33:39 +0000 http://www.kuliniewicz.org/blog/archives/2008/03/19/true-or-false/#comment-1808 Can't there be more than one fictitious construct? Can’t there be more than one fictitious construct?

]]> By: Jamie Weigandt http://www.kuliniewicz.org/blog/archives/2008/03/19/true-or-false/#comment-1807 Jamie Weigandt Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:57:37 +0000 http://www.kuliniewicz.org/blog/archives/2008/03/19/true-or-false/#comment-1807 Wasn't it the heretofore loop? Wasn’t it the heretofore loop?

]]> By: Paul Kuliniewicz http://www.kuliniewicz.org/blog/archives/2008/03/19/true-or-false/#comment-1802 Paul Kuliniewicz Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:31:10 +0000 http://www.kuliniewicz.org/blog/archives/2008/03/19/true-or-false/#comment-1802 <blockquote><tt>$ ifelsefor<br /> bash: ifelsefor: command not found</tt></blockquote> The duck has been AWOL.

$ ifelsefor
bash: ifelsefor: command not found

The duck has been AWOL.

]]> By: Benji http://www.kuliniewicz.org/blog/archives/2008/03/19/true-or-false/#comment-1800 Benji Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:28:48 +0000 http://www.kuliniewicz.org/blog/archives/2008/03/19/true-or-false/#comment-1800 What happens if you type ifelsefor? Does the computer do something awesome? Also, have you, uh, have you seen the Duck? What happens if you type ifelsefor? Does the computer do something awesome? Also, have you, uh, have you seen the Duck?

]]>